| | |
26 January 2011
The Art of Debating and Public Speaking:
Info Suite
For a comprehensive information of public speaking please refer
to
Speak for
success....
Preparation
Giving a speech in a competitive environment is different
to giving one at a wedding reception, in a business presentation
or at school or university. The skills to learn are very similar,
but the circumstances require a different attitude. Often
competitive public speakers are reluctant to give speeches
in other circumstances for this very reason. The guidelines
in this section are written to help you make the most out
of the competition, but remember that they are guidelines
which are useful in virtually any form of public speech. Reading
the adjudication guidelines as well will help you to tailor
your speech to the requirements of this competition.
While each type of public speech has different aims, we can
still identify common purposes. In general, a public speech
should seek to
· inform
· entertain
· persuade
· inspire
Consider the types of public speech that you have encountered
in the past and try to identify their purposes. Teachers seek
to inspire and entertain for the purpose of informing their
students. Politicians seek to inform people of their policies
and persuade them that these policies should be adopted. Campaigners
often need to persuade their audiences that their position
is right to inspire their audiences to support their cause.
The most compelling and powerful public speeches do all four.
For example, a politician could seek to persuade their audience
by presenting lies, but the persuasiveness of that speech
disappears once those lies are revealed. A speech that not
only persuades, but accurately informs is far more likely
to have an enduring impact on the audience.
Credibility
Credibility is fundamental to public speaking. Having credibility
doesn't have to mean being the most qualified or knowledgeable,
but it does mean making good, valid and preferably strong
arguments.
Valid arguments are judged on their soundness, but not necessarily
their truth. So you don't need to prove your argument is true,
just that it is sound. Good arguments make logical sense.
They do not make assumptions or miss out key points. Strong
arguments are both valid and good, and have the added bonus
of being highly likely. This makes them easier to believe,
and easier to be persuaded by. If you have a choice between
a good argument with weak justifications (hard to understand
or easy to disagree with) and one with strong justifications
(easy to understand and hard to disagree with) - choose the
strong argument!
Remember that your audience, including the judges, may not
have detailed knowledge of your topic. A credible speech will
not blind the audience with facts or assertions. If you want
to use technical terms or complex facts, take time to explain
them, and make sure they are relevant to your argument.
Building a strong, good and valid argument will give your
speech credibility with an audience who neither knows you
nor the details of your subject.
Choosing a topic
You are restricted by the theme of the competition, but may
interpret it in any way you wish within the guidelines.
Will my topic capture the audience's interest?
Your audience does not necessarily need to be interested
in your subject before the speech. Indeed, most speeches that
set out to inform will be on things that people know very
little about, but the subject should capture their imagination.
As your speech is only a maximum of five minutes, think about
the ways in which interest can be captured within a few sentences.
Does it have obvious parallels with something that they do
know about? The stock market may seem like an impenetrable
topic for discussion, until you consider how similar it is
to gambling. Does it affect their lives, even if they don't
realise it? Allocation of government resources could be linked
with the availability of teachers or hospital beds.
Are there links between this topic and areas that an audience
may already have an interest in? Intellectual property rights
seem like a mundane topic until you consider that intellectual
property rights are breached every time a song or a movie
is downloaded illegally.
Am I interested in the topic?
Somewhat unsurprisingly, an effective prepared speech requires
a significant amount of time in preparation!
We suggest that you talk to your teachers, parents and mentors
about your choice of topic. This will help you find an area
that you find interesting, but may not necessarily have existing
knowledge of. Selecting a topic that you have an interest
in means you will be more motivated when researching and composing
it, and will therefore produce a better speech. Enthusiasm
is an incredibly difficult thing to fake! On the other hand,
if you already know a lot of detailed information, you may
be tempted to show your depth of knowledge to the detriment
of the structure of the speech. Picking a subject to speak
on that is new to you will help you to produce a well-researched,
interesting and engaging speech.
Am I able to research my topic effectively?
You will need to use information in your speech to inform
and persuade your audience. Use a range of sources, which
can include the internet, school or local libraries, interviews
or personal experiences. Refer to them in your speech so the
adjudicators know you have a broad base for your arguments.
The questions that follow your speech are designed to test
your knowledge and understanding of your chosen topic. Therefore,
you should have carried out sufficient research to be able
to answer questions relating to the subject matter of your
speech.
Can I properly discuss my chosen topic in the limited time
I have available?
Some topics are unfamiliar to audiences and may require considerable
amounts of background information simply to give context to
your speech.
For example, it is probably impossible to reasonably convince
people that "The Meiji Restoration in Japan was unfair
on the daimyos" if you have to begin your talk with a
description of the state of Japan before the Restoration,
then tell us what the Restoration changed, tell us what a
daimyo is, and then present analysis of your previous descriptions
to show how the daimyos suffered wrongly as a result of the
Restoration, all in five minutes!
If you need to give background information or explain technical
terms make sure they do not take up any more than a few simple
sentences. If they do, consider refining your topic.
Interpreting the theme
You are not allowed to use the theme as your title. The theme
is quite broad and deliberately does not suggest a specific
subject area.
Stick to the guidelines above about manageable topics that
you are interested in. Don't try to second guess what the
'intention' was behind the choice of theme, and do not pick
something that you feel you ought to talk about in preference
to something you really want to talk about. Also remember
that adjudicators will be hearing a lot of speeches in succession,
so interpreting the theme in a creative way will result in
a more original speech that will stand out in the adjudicators'
mind.
Inform, entertain, persuade, inspire
Above we discussed the purposes of a speech and saw how those
purposes establish credibility. In this competition you have
a limited period of time to deliver your speech, aiming simply
to inform or entertain the audience will probably not enable
you to fully demonstrate your public speaking skills. You
should aim to use your speech to persuade your audience of
your assertion, or to inspire them to take a certain action.
Statement of intent
'If you can't write your speech in a sentence, you can't
say it in an hour'
Remember that writing a speech is different to writing an
essay. You don't have the opportunity to go back and reread
sentences or pause to consider a complex statement. Clarity
is crucial to effective delivery. To ensure that your speech
remains clear, try to draw up what you believe will be the
core of the speech; a few sentences that explain the purpose
of the speech and its main points.
Complete the following sentence: "At the end of my speech
I want to have convinced the audience that... "
Give yourself a specific target. For example, rather than
saying "At the end of my speech I want to have convinced
the audience that global poverty is bad", say "At
the end of my speech I want to have convinced my audience
that global poverty is bad, there are ways in which the audience
can address it, and that they have a responsibility to do
so". This is your statement of intent.
You do not have to include the statement of intent in your
speech, but having one allows you to tie your main points
to what your speech sets out to achieve. By way of example,
find a public speech that you find appealing and one that
you find unappealing or confusing. Try to write a statement
of intent for each. The speech for which you find it easier
to identify a core aim, will be the speech you find more appealing.
Supporting your statement of intent
Each clause in your statement of intent is a claim that needs
to be identified and then supported. Looking at the example,
we can see there are three claims:
"global poverty is an important issue", "the
audience can take action to alleviate it", and "the
audience has a responsibility to do so"
Research evidence to support each of these claims to make
your speech a valid and good argument. You need to explain
how your evidence supports what you are saying, this will
helps to make it a strong argument.
Conflicting evidence and opinions
Interesting speeches often make claims that are controversial.
In the course of your research, you will discover information
surrounding your topic that does not support your conclusion
and opinions that differ from your own. Don't ignore these!
Take time in your speech to acknowledge, explore and recognise
other points of view, before comparing them carefully with
your own evidence and reasons to come to a balanced conclusion.
That is much more effective as a method of persuasion because
it creates more credibility for you. When persuading the audience
to adopt a particular point of view, think about the ways
in which your arguments might be opposed, and try to incorporate
the response to those arguments in your speech. After all,
an audience is more likely to be persuaded by someone who
understands the alternatives and can justify their position,
than by someone who only knows or understands one view.
Audiences aren't passive; they think about and question the
material that you present, and are more likely to be persuaded
by arguments that you have tested, and subsequently strengthened.
Methods of illustration
There are all sorts of pieces of evidence that could support
your claim, not just what you might think of as 'facts'.
· Common sense beliefs or idiom - if you can connect the
idea that you are trying to communicate to a belief that is
deeply held by the audience, then it is likely to persuade
them;
· Narrative - simple stories can often communicate complex
ideas by way of metaphor;
· Humour can also be effective - getting the audience to
laugh at an idea makes it easy to then convince them that
the idea is wrong.
Try to remember the ways by which you have been convinced
in the past to change your view, or become interested in an
issue, and use those techniques in your speech to connect
with the audience.
Think of evidence as illustration in the most literal sense
- shedding light on the issue, illuminating your ideas and
making them easily understood by the audience. However, always
remember to show how your evidence is relevant and how it
supports what you are saying.
Researching your topic
Researching your topic is essential. Even if you have prior
knowledge of your chosen topic, you will need to broaden your
perspective on the issue, considering a broader range of sources
and alternative perspectives. When researching your topic,
you should be mindful of the following points:
· You should consider different types of sources, such as
fact-based sources (e.g. encyclopaedias), opinion-based sources
(e.g. newspapers) and academic sources (e.g. journals)
· You should also aim to ensure that you have the most up-to-date
information on your topic. The internet can be very useful
for this (e.g. Google).
· Where statistics are employed as evidence, you should aim
to have two or more sources to support your argument. You
do not need to quote these sources, but you should be aware
of them, particularly for questions.
· Anecdotal evidence (e.g. personal stories, myths and memories)
should never be the primary source supporting your arguments,
but may be a very effective way to demonstrate the human elements
of your speech and inspire passion or empathy in the audience.
Anecdotal evidence is also, very often, entertaining.
|